vendredi 31 juillet 2015

Final permit for new $750m BC gold mine

Pretium jumps on final permit for $750m BC gold mine

Pretium Resources Brucejack project in 2011

Shares in Pretium Resources Inc (TSE:PVG) enjoyed a nice bump on Friday after the company received final provincial and federal approval for its Brucejack mine in northwest British Columbia.

By the close the Vancouver-based company was trading at $6.53, up 4.5% on the Toronto Stock Exchange, down from a 7.5% advance shortly after the opening of trading.

A higher than usual 346,000 shares in the $865 million company changed hands on the day.

With all necessary federal approvals, a provincial environmental assessment certificate and Mines Act permit now in place, construction of the new Brucejack mine is expected to get underway in 2015, the BC mines ministry said in a statement on Friday.

Pretium pegs capital expenditure for the Brucejack underground operation located about 65 km northwest of Stewart at just less than $750 million with targeted commercial production in 2017. The company received a $81 million investment from China's Zijin Mining in December for a stake just shy of 10%.

The gold and silver mine in the Valley of the Kings near the Alaskan border will create approximately 900 jobs during the two-year construction period and 500 jobs during an estimated 18-year operating life.

A feasibility study completed in June 2014 outlined proven and probable mineral reserves of 6.9 million ounces of gold (13.6 million tonnes grading 15.7 grams per tonne gold).

Average annual production of 504,000 ounces of gold over the first 8 years and 404,000 ounces of gold over the life of mine is expected with 2,700 tonnes milled every day.

Brucejack is the first mine greenlighted in BC since the failure of Imperial Metal’s Mount Polley tailings dam last summer.

The Ministry of Energy and Mines said Brucejack's tailings will be stored underground in spent mine workings, and in the nearby lake, which contains no fish.

The post Final permit for new $750m BC gold mine appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1HbRW0M

West African gold miner surges after stellar quarter

Endeavour Mining Corporation (TSX:EDV) raced ahead on Friday after releasing second quarter results that ticked all the right boxes for a mid-tier gold miner operating in today's market.

In early afternoon trade the Vancouver-based company was trading at $0.52, up 10.6% on the Toronto Venture Exchange, at its high for the day. More than 685,000 shares in the $215 million company changed hands.

Q2 wasn't the first quarter the company delivered these kinds of results and investors have clearly picked up the trend: unlike most if its peers Endeavour's stock has enjoyed  a positive 2015 – the counter is up 22% year to date. The company is also listed in Sydney (ASX:EVR).

Endeavour announced second quarter gold production of 131,165 ounces from its flagship Agbaou mine in Cote d'Ivoire and three other mines in Ghana, Mali and Burkina Faso.

Output was at a much reduced all-in cost that's been pushed below $900 an ounce from $946 in the first quarter (and an average of $1,137 in 2013)  resulting in an all-in sustaining margin of $38.2 million. Net income in the first half was $50.5 million.

The company said it's tracking at the upper-end of the 475,000 to 500,000 ounces gold production guidance for the year after producing 255,000 in the first half. Similarly average costs for the year should come in at the low-end of the expected $930 to $980.

According to a statement, for the six-month period, Endeavour has generated $59 million of free cash flow (before tax and financing) to deliver 59% of the $100 million full year target based on guidance range mid-points.

That's enabled the company to make two $20 million unscheduled early payments on its debt – one in January and one in July – to bring outstanding debt to $260 million. Cash on hand is $52.7 million.

Endeavour CFO Ota Hally tells MINING.com at the ruling $1,100 gold price quarterly cash flows would be some $12 million below what's been achieved so far which means it could continue to pay down debt ahead of schedule.

Hally says the strong operational results are thanks to a primary focus on cost reductions and creating cash flow regardless of the price of gold: "Forex and cheaper oil has helped bring down costs, but our operations GMs still have room to make cuts when it's required."

The Agbaou open pit, which started commercial production at the beginning of last year, has been a transformational asset for the company says Doug Reddy, executive VP for business development.

That's thanks in no small part to some eye-watering margins at the soft oxide ore mine – $482 per ounce cash and $619 mine-level all-in during the latest quarter.

West African gold miner surges after stellar quarter

Agbaou plant in Cote d'Ivoire

Reddy says the company's exploration program at Agbaou is replacing mined oxides and the company strategy has always been to do all the work and "take exploration all the way through to reserves."

The next step for the company which Reddy says would be as transformational as Agbaou is the Houndé project in Burkina Faso. Endeavour received the mining permit for the 90%-owned project with the West African nation holding the remainder, in February.

Houndé would add roughly 190,000 ounces per year over an initial 10 year mine life to Endeavour's output with the first two years averaging 248,000 ounces per year.

At 2 million ounces and average grading of 2.15g/t, it's one of the top projects in West Africa says Reddy. The mine's capital outlay is $325 million.

Endeavour's board, which includes among other high-profile members,Vancouver billionaire Frank Giustra and African gold mining luminaries Michael Beckett and Ian Cockerill, is set to make a decision on Houndé at the end of the year.

With costs on par with Agbaou "at $1,200 it's a no-brainer" says Hally, adding that while it's not an automatic green light "it will get built, it's just a question of when."

The post West African gold miner surges after stellar quarter appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1I8afIe

Today's charts of the day are $GOLD (Gold – Spot Price) and $HUI (Gold Bugs Index).

Today's charts of the day - Gold - Spot Price

Today's charts of the day - HUI Gold Bugs Index

The post Today's charts of the day are $GOLD (Gold – Spot Price) and $HUI (Gold Bugs Index). appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1eHoYzh

Peruvian police burns down entire illegal gold mine town

Peruvian police burns down entire illegal gold mine townArmed police swooped in to Peru’s Amazon basin this week, burning down an entre town that was home to a vast illegal gold operation, which caused the destruction of a huge swathe of rainforest.

The unprecedented operation, El Telégrafo reports (in Spanish), involved nearly 900 police officers and armed helicopters, which main mission was to eradicate 55 illegal mining settlements in the Peruvian jungle.

The action triggered severe criticism, with many are accusing authorities of an excessive use of public force. But the illegal mining commissioner, Antonio Fernandez, says these operations will continue. "We have to keep doing this until these criminals understand that what they do is illegal," he told the newspaper, adding that illegal mining usually goes hand in hand with other criminal activities, such as child labour and prostitution.

Peruvian police burns down entire illegal gold mine town

The illegal activity also carries an enormous ecological price. Mercury is most commonly used to extract gold particles, but illegal miners use it in an inappropriate way, letting the toxic metal contaminate rivers and destroying wildlife’s natural habitats.

The latest crackdown is not, however, the first time Peru tries intimidating illegals with massive operations. In November last year, the government sent 1,000 police to dismantle gold mining camps in the same area, known as La Pampa.

Peruvian police burns down entire illegal gold mine townUp until two years ago no one knew the full extent of the damage, until a research team from the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington DC, and Peru’s Ministry of the Environment used satellite imagery to map the destruction.

The findings shocked millions and finally highlighted the devastating effect the illegal mines have had.

According to official figures, there are more than a half million illegal miners operating Peru and it is estimated that more that 22% of the $10 billion Peru gets from gold exports comes from illegal mining.

Images from Peru’s Government via YouTube.

The post Peruvian police burns down entire illegal gold mine town appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1IOXhma

Former Exxon President on mission to clean up oil sands

Canada has given oil sands a dirty reputation, but a breakthrough, commercially viable technology has caught the eye of a former Exxon Mobil president who is putting it to use to clean up Utah's billions of barrels of oil sands.

Imagine extracting high-quality oil out of the estimated 32 billion barrels buried in Utah's oil sands, without creating the toxic wastelands that have resulted from oil sands projects in Western Canada. And imagine doing it at a cost that can still turn a profit in today's oil price slump.

That would be highly enticing to some of the large operators in the Uinta Basin, Utah's emerging tight oil play. As shale production has soared across the country, operators have moved to Utah to try to coax oil and gas from shale rock in ways that have been done on such a large scale elsewhere. Major players such as Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO), EP Energy Corporation (NYSE:EPE) and Newfield Exploration Co. (NYSE:NFX) have significant exposure in Utah.

But Utah's oil sands are suddenly attracting a lot more attention because of their vast potential. The poor environmental reputation and high cost has kept companies away up until now, but armed with a new, clean oil sands technology, there is even talk that Utah could shift its focus away from expensive shale.

Protecting the environment and still profiting from oil has long been a major challenge, particularly when it comes to dirty oil sands, but that could all change if a new technology designed specifically to extract these oil sands in the most environmentally friendly way possible proves successful.

For five decades, companies have been trying to replicate Alberta's oil sands success in Utah, but without turning the state into a toxic wasteland. A former Exxon president of Arabian Gulf operations, Dr. R Gerald Bailey, is one of several to take up the challenge, where today he is CEO of a small oil services technology company called MCW Energy Group (MCWEF:OTCQB).

"It is really simple," Dr. Bailey told Oilprice.com. "In the same way that soap washes grease from plates, with the grease adhering to the soap and pulling it off, so new technology in the form of an innovative solvent can pull the oil out of oil sands." Oil sands are typically black and dirty looking. However, once washed with the solvent, the sand comes out 99.9 percent clean before it is returned to the Earth, according to Dr. Bailey. "If we throw it back on the Earth, it is no longer contaminated with oil and you can grow plants on it."

This is not just about making oil, Dr. Bailey opines. It's about remediation. "After the tragic Deepwater Horizon disaster, we could have gone over there and cleaned that beach up with this new technology." The company is focusing on Utah, but sees future potential abroad in places like Russia, China, Afghanistan, the Dominican Republic, Namibia, Jordan and Trinidad.

Other companies are working on similar technologies as environmental groups and governments turn increasingly hostile to dirty oil sands. Marathon Oil is developing a proprietary solvent technology, in which wet tailings are dried and deposited back into a mine site as back-fill. Imperial Oil (TSE: IMO), a Canadian oil company, is doing something similar.

The focus of any new oil extraction technology must be on the environment—both Canada's toxic wastelands and the fallout from hydraulic fracturing have ensured that new technologies can no longer push full speed ahead towards profit while ignoring the longer-term consequences.

While shale producers are taking a nose-dive in this market, experts estimate that production using new solvent technologies in Utah can be more profitable than shale oil currently being produced, and more profitable than any other oil sands project in North America.

It costs about $55 per barrel to produce oil sands in Alberta. But independent research has shown that MCW Energy Group can produce oil from Utah oil sands at approximately $30 for clean oil sands.

From an environmental standpoint, it would seem that the goals are also being achieved. The process employed does not use any water, which is a significant selling point in the dry state of Utah, and produces no waste or pollutants, including no more tailing ponds.

Can it apply Canada's oil sands as well?

According to Dr. Bailey of MCW Energy, the Utah sands differ as they are oil-wet and not water-wet, and because they can simply be scooped up with a front loader and then processed with the solvent. The oil separates out and the clean sand is returned to the ground. In Canada, however, the sand must be mined because it is several hundred feet underground and requires extraction with steam and subsequent hot water, which becomes highly contaminated. "The huge acres of tailing ponds can be seen from space."

But while it may seem a daunting task, the new technology can tackle even Alberta's oil sands waste problem—after the process, according to Dr. Bailey, without using any water. "We would just use a de-watering process and then treat the raw sludge with our solvent."

The much-maligned oil sands may yet have a viable future in a world increasingly concerned about the environment.

Source: http://ift.tt/1SlDU8R

By James Stafford of Oilprice.com

The post Former Exxon President on mission to clean up oil sands appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1JASlAf

Ebola : rVSV-ZEBOV, le vaccin en test, semble vraiment efficace

Testé sur plus de 4.000 personnes en Guinée, le vaccin expérimental rVSV-ZEBOV s'est révélé efficace chez tous les sujets. Ces résultats restent à confirmer, estime l'OMS qui conclut tout de même qu'« un vaccin est à portée de main ».

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1KFBF9s

La chute du pétrole engloutit les bénéfices d'ExxonMobil et Chevron

prix du petrole New YorkNew York: La chute des prix du pétrole a frappé de plein fouet les deux majors pétrolières américaines, ExxonMobil annonçant vendredi ses plus faibles bénéfices trimestriels depuis 2009 et Chevron ses plus mauvais profits depuis plus d'une décennie.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1eGzLK7

Wage negotiations in S. Africa’s gold sector to end next week

Wage negotiations in S. Africa’s gold sector to end next week

President Jacob Zuma addresses Lonmin miners, 22 Aug 2012. (Image from the Government of South Africa’s Flickr photo stream)

South Africa’s top gold producers say it is highly likely that unions agree to take the latest pay offer presented to them, as players try to avoid a new wave of strikes, such as the one that paralyzed the country’s platinum sector last year.

According to the Chamber of Mines’ lead negotiator, Elize Strydom, the unions are now in the process of presenting the offers to their respective members next week.

“We believe this is a generous offer which is above inflation and at the limit of what this industry can bear whilst remaining sustainable,” she said in a statement. “It is our final offer, and we hope our employees will accept it so we can move forward together to confront the challenges the industry faces.”

The improved proposal includes reducing the wage-deal term to three years from five and offering a basic pay higher than before. However, the increase of monthly pay doesn’t translate into higher benefits, and the offer only applies if all four unions agree to it, the companies said.

Bullion prices have slumped 10% since wage negotiations began late June, touching a five-year low and hurting companies already struggling due to higher output costs.

The post Wage negotiations in S. Africa’s gold sector to end next week appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1gtGwAB

Mining Companies, Regulators Deathly Silent after Midnight Raid on Gold Prices

With gold and silver on the defensive following a dramatic midnight raid on gold prices last week, Mike Gleason reached out to Chris Powell, Secretary Treasurer at the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, also known as GATA to discuss possible gold price manipulation.

Mike Gleason: Several days ago, we had another attack on the gold market – right as it was holding above a critical price support zone. Someone sold several billions of dollars in gold futures contracts during the wee hours of the night immediately before the Chinese trading day began. It happened during a time of low liquidity like it normally does, and it took the price down over $40 in the matter of a few seconds, halting trading twice for a brief period. What are we to make of all this Chris?

Chris Powell: Well it's pretty depressing for monetary metals investors. On the other hand, I suppose you could see it in a way as progress for the cause because it was the most brazen, obvious, clumsy attack yet, and it has prompted a few people to acknowledge that it was a manipulation.

The problem is the people who are acknowledging that cannot quite bring themselves to question whether the central banks were involved in it. But it was so obvious that even people who are not aligned with the manipulation school are acknowledging that somebody was very heavily trying to drive the price down.

Now I think we've advanced to the point where most market observers will acknowledge that somebody is tampering with the gold market, that it's not a free market, and the question now is really only who's doing it, and perhaps in another few hundred years financial journalism will try to put a critical question to central banks about their own surreptitious trades in the gold market.

Mike Gleason: It certainly seems manipulative, because obviously a legitimate seller would try to sell when there is actual liquidity in the market as to maximize the sale price, and we've seen this sort of thing a number of times going back years now. So it is quite obvious what's happening, and there don't seem to be major investigations into these price raids. It just keeps happening. Why don't we see government authorities or large investors crying foul?

Chris Powell: Well because these raids, I am sure, are essentially instigated or underwritten by, if not actually implemented by governments. What some people don't realize Mike is that it is explicitly authorized by federal law here in the United States for the U.S. government, acting through the Exchange Stabilization Fund and the Federal Reserve, to rig any market. Not only in the United States, but in the world.

GATA brought a lawsuit in U.S. district court in Boston back in 2001. I attended the only hearing on this lawsuit, and an assistant U.S. attorney representing the Fed and the Treasury Department told the court in support of a motion for summary judgment dismissal that the lawsuit had to be dismissed because the complaint of market rigging had no remedy at law. Because the assistant U.S. attorney said the United States government claimed the power to do all the market rigging that our lawsuit accused it of doing!

Our own subsequent research into the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 as amended in the 1970's tended to confirm that assertion. The nice thing about that hearing was that the U.S. government through this assistant U.S. attorney got up and claimed the power to rig every market in the world. That's what the statute says.

We’re just having a very hard time getting the mainstream financial press to look at the statute and to put questions about surreptitious trading by central banks to the central banks themselves. But this most recent attack was so brazen and really clumsy. I know people think it was so clever because of its timing and the timing of it, the lack of liquidity and everything like that, but they gave themselves away. And I think that is a sign of desperation that they no longer can attack gold and keep the price down in subtle ways. They have to do this really obvious ham-handed stuff that even gets some pretty dense market observers suspicious.

For 10 years, GATA Chairman Bill Murphy and I have been observing this market, and practically every day for 10 years we've been saying they couldn't get any more obvious. And the next day they DO get more obvious. This one really I think took the cake, there's a Reuters' story that quotes a couple of gold traders as acknowledging that this was a manipulation, and they're wondering out loud who's behind it.

Now if Reuters can acknowledge that this attack on the gold market was a market rigging attack…. Well, we're that much closer to pinning responsibility on the main parties involved, which are Western Central banks.

Now, I don't know how much longer this is going to take us, but I think it's progress insofar as even the densest observers of the market are acknowledging it's manipulation.

Unfortunately, mining industry executives themselves are quiet about this, and the World Gold Council as usual has nothing to say. But at least the scales are starting to fall from the eyes of a few people, precisely because these attacks are becoming more and more brazen and clumsy.

Precious Metals Mining Industry Seems Content to “Die Quietly and Obediently”

Mike Gleason: That leads me right into my next question here, I know you've been encouraging mining companies to band together and hold back some of their production from markets at these suppressed prices. I know First Majestic has been sitting on some of their silver production in the past year, but I know it's tough. If miners don't sell metal, they may not have the cash flow needed to keep the lights on. What is your sense of what the mining industry is thinking?

Chris Powell: The mining industry, Mike, is thinking that it should just die quietly and obediently! I think its value is likely to fall to zero, and its executives will have nothing to say for themselves or their companies all the way to zero. The industry is worthless, and it's worthless not so much because of the attack on the monetary metals by central banks. It's worthless because its own shareholders and executives are content to die quietly. If the industry will not stand up for itself, I have no idea why anyone would want to invest in it.

Mike Gleason: What about the institutions in the metals markets such as the World Gold Council and Silver Users Association? I guess you commented on that a moment ago but to expand on that where are they coming from on all of this?

Chris Powell: Well, I can only speculate about their motives, Mike. I think I can clearly say that they are useless to investors in the monetary metals. I find it laughable that something like the Sunday night/Monday morning attack on gold could happen, and here we are, many days later, and the World Gold Council had nothing to say about it!

Particularly when even some gold traders are quoted by Reuters and The Financial Times, and other people are saying, “gee, this is an attack, this is a manipulation.”

I think it exists mainly to make sure that there is no worldwide voice for gold investors and gold mining companies, because it's absolutely useless in the context of the attack on the industry. It will have to answer for itself if anybody wants to try to get answers out of them. I wish the financial press would call up the World Gold Council today and ask it, “Hey what do you think about what happened Sunday night and Monday morning? Are you in the least suspicious about it?” I think they'll just get stony silence out of them and I think they’re really the worst of the industry.

 

 

Mike Gleason is a Director with Money Metals Exchange, a national precious metals dealer with over 50,000 customers. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason has extensive experience in management, sales and logistics as well as precious metals investing. Gleason has hosted a weekly precious metals podcast since 2010, a program listened to by thousands each week.

The post Mining Companies, Regulators Deathly Silent after Midnight Raid on Gold Prices appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1haMKpe

Rosneft dénonce des nouvelles sanctions américaines illégales

prix du petrole moscouMoscou: Le géant pétrolier russe Rosneft a dénoncé vendredi les nouvelles sanctions illégales adoptées par les États-Unis contre certaines de ses filiales en raison du rôle présumé de la Russie dans la guerre en Ukraine, ajoutant vouloir demander réparation devant la justice.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1JVC2JZ

Survival of the fittest — what to expect for rare earth miners outside China

Survival of the fittest — what to expect for rare earth miners outside China

Molycorp’s Mountain Pass rare earth facility. (Image courtesy of Molycorp)

While analyst are predicting a rebound in hard-hit rare earth prices later this year, the question that remains unanswered is whether companies outside China, the world’s largest producer, will be able to challenge its dominance.

Melody Bomgardner, a senior editor at Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN), the weekly newsmagazine of the American Chemical Society, is not so sure.

In a piece published this week, he argues that most of the mining companies that once bet on rare earths are now facing a contradictory reality, as they are working to hike output at a time of extremely weak prices, which make it nearly impossible to turn a profit.

Until 2010, China controlled around 97% of the supply of the coveted metals, used in advanced electronics, defense and renewable energy. But when it sought to impose export controls to give an advantage to domestic electronics producers, prices soared by up to 20 or 30 times previous levels. That encouraged investment in the sector in the U.S., Australia and other places outside China. But, at the same time, it fired up smuggling from the Asian nation and a consequent drop in prices.

Rare earths were further battered earlier this year, when China scrapped export tariffs, which had inflated international prices, after a World Trade Organisation ruling.

Now market observers are saying that prices for the 17 coveted elements used in high-tech sectors, should start picking up by year-end. However, they also warn that a glut of supplies, including from illegal mines and smuggling in China, could cause the market to crash back down.

“[The expected rise in prices] is not going to bring us entirely out of the doldrums, but it's going to bring us back to a better place than we're at today,” Amsterdam-based consultant Ryan Castilloux, founding director of Adamas Intelligence, told Reuters earlier this month.

Investment confidence has been badly hit by the performances of the two major producers outside China — Molycorp (NYSE:MCP-A) and Lynas Corp (ASX:LYC).

Canadian rare earth companies have also shed nearly all of their value in the last few years. Shares of Avalon Rare Metals (TSE:AVL) are down 96% from their 2011 high, while Quest Rare Minerals’ (TSE:QRM) stocks have dropped about the same, since March 2012.

Meanwhile, China continues to restrict the number of firms allowed to produce and export rare earths. This means there will remain a significant supply bottleneck that is likely to encourage smuggling as well as illegal production in the nation, with the feared consequences in prices.

The post Survival of the fittest — what to expect for rare earth miners outside China appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1IcREZn

Nos pulsions alimentaires seraient calmées par l'hormone GLP-1

Des chercheurs américains ont identifié une hormone jouant un rôle important dans les pulsions alimentaires : la GLP-1 pour Glucagon like peptide-1 en anglais. Activée, cette hormone réduirait la consommation d'aliments riches en graisses. En revanche, lorsque le taux de GLP-1 est moindre, cela...

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1JAtQTE

Le pétrole baisse à l'ouverture à New York dans un marché déprimé

prix du petrole New YorkNew York: Les cours du pétrole baissaient vendredi à l'ouverture à New York, reflétant le pessimisme des investisseurs face au manque d'éléments encourageants sur une réduction du niveau toujours excessif de l'offre mondiale de brut.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1OSIJAU

Chevron: bénéfice net 2T en chute de 90%, inscrit 2,6 milliards de charges pour désinvestissements

prix du petrole New YorkNew York: La compagnie pétrolière américaine Chevron a subi une chute de 90% de son bénéfice net au 2e trimestre à 571 milliards de dollars et a inscrit pour quelque 2,6 milliards de dollars (bien 2,6 milliards) de charges et de dépréciations.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1OF4aF3

T-shirts Futura-Sciences : sauvez les abeilles !

Les abeilles, toujours au cœur de l’actualité, sont plus que jamais menacées par les produits phytosanitaires. Cet été, pour afficher votre engagement à leurs côtés, Futura-Sciences vous propose des T-shirts originaux. « To bee or not to bee », telle est la question : portez leur message !

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1MBGBiP

Chronique : parcourez la fantastique île de la Réunion

La Réunion, ou île Bourbon, est un volcan posé sur le fond de l'océan Indien et qui en a émergé il y a trois ou quatre millions d'années. L'activité volcanique, incessante, et l'érosion, la plus intense au monde, a sculpté des paysages inimaginables et vertigineux, envahis par une nature jeune...

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1DVu7uk

ExxonMobil: la chute du pétrole divise par plus de 2 les bénéfices trimestriels

prix du petrole New YorkNew York: Le géant pétrolier américain ExxonMobil a vu son bénéfice net divisé par plus de deux au deuxième trimestre à 4,2 mrd USD, plombé par une perte dans l'activité à fortes marges de production-exploration du pétrole aux Etats-Unis.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1OSD6Tl

Windows 10, le nouvel OS de Microsoft

Microsoft a commencé le déploiement de son nouveau système d’exploitation Windows 10 dont la mise à jour est gratuite depuis Windows 7 et 8, sous certaines conditions. L’éditeur joue gros avec cette nouvelle mouture qui sera son OS unique pour les prochaines années, aussi bien sur les...

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1hany28

Le pétrole recule, l'Opep ne compte pas réduire son plafond

prix du petrole LondresLondres: Les prix du pétrole baissaient vendredi en cours d'échanges européens, l'Organisation des pays exportateurs de pétrole (Opep) ayant répété jeudi qu'elle ne comptait pas réduire sa production d'or noir.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1De1wWf

Première mondiale : un enfant greffé des deux mains

Aux États-Unis, des chirurgiens ont réalisé la première double greffe de mains et d’avant-bras sur un enfant. Zion Harvey, âgé de 8 ans, avait été amputé de ses mains et de ses pieds suite à une grave infection.

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1UbElQH

Mort de Jean-Paul Zahn, pionnier de l'astrophysique française

L’essor de l’astrophysique en France après la seconde guerre mondiale est étroitement lié au groupe d’élèves côtoyant l'académicien Evry Schatzman, grand spécialiste des étoiles. L’un des membres éminents de ce groupe, Jean-Paul Zahn, astronome émérite à l’Observatoire de Paris, vient de décéder...

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1MB3WRv

jeudi 30 juillet 2015

BMO's Andrew Kaip: The gold majors are back

Andrew Kaip, managing director of mining equity research at BMO Capital Markets, does not expect near-term higher prices for gold or silver. However, due to continuing cost cutting and other efficiencies, he argues that the senior gold producers can now make profits above $1,100/oz gold. In this interview with The Gold Report, Kaip names two seniors as Sector Outperformers, and touts the virtues of a half-dozen undervalued near-term gold and silver producers.

The Gold Report: You recently became managing director of mining equity research at BMO Capital Markets. What kind of overview of the gold and silver sectors does this position entail?

Andrew Kaip: Taking one of the lead roles at BMO Research has given me the opportunity to step away from the day to day of covering stocks. Supervising a team of analysts allows me to spend more time thinking about where we are in the gold and silver cycles and the implications for investors. That's precisely what we did when we launched coverage on the senior gold producers.

TGR: So where is gold in its current cycle?

AK: At BMO, we've kind of stuck our neck out after some deliberate thought, and we're suggesting a lot of similarities between 2001 and 2015. The price of gold was low then, just as it is now. Similarly, the gold producers of 2015 have come to resemble those of 2001, in that they have finally, after a long struggle, stabilized their operations such that they can contend with low prices. They have shut down unprofitable mines and lowered costs at those that they have kept.

I believe that gold producers are now in the early stage of a new cycle.

TGR: What are your 2015 and 2016 forecasts for the price of gold?

AK: Quite flat. We forecast a 2015 average price of $1,200 per ounce ($1,200/oz) and an average of $1,180/oz for 2016. Beyond that, we expect a slow and gradual rebound to about $1,250/oz long term.

TGR: And your forecasts for silver?

AK: Very much the same story. We forecast a year-end 2015 price of $16.43/oz, $16/oz for 2016 and $17/oz for 2017. We expect silver will then move toward $21/oz long term.

TGR: Despite the continuing massive expansion of global money supply and a host of geopolitical crises, most recently the possible exit or expulsion of Greece from the Eurozone, the gold price slid. Isn't this counterintuitive?

AK: At first glance, it would seem counterintuitive. One might have expected that the Greek crisis would have supported a high gold price. I recently returned from a marketing tour throughout Europe and discussed this issue with investors. The reality is that the Greek contagion has been mostly isolated. To be honest, Greece is a very small component of the European economy, and so the crisis has a quite small global macroeconomic effect. It is not regarded as having any serious implications for the United States.

More pertinent to the current price of gold is the discussion regarding whether the Federal Reserve will raise the prime rate in September.

TGR: We have heard talk of the Fed raising interest rates for years. U.S. gross domestic product fell 0.2% in Q1/15. Would the Fed really increase rates when the U.S. economy could be heading into a recession?

AK: No, it wouldn't. But many economic data points must be released before it can be said that the U.S. economy is in recession. Right now, the data are mixed. We go through periods where the U.S. economy starts hitting good numbers, and investors get quite constructive about it. Then we see a couple of soft numbers, and the discussion changes to the unlikelihood of higher interest rates.

I believe the U.S. economic trend continues to be more positive than negative. That is why, for instance, we've seen job numbers improve over the last few years, and quite frankly, why the U.S. dollar is as strong as it is. BMO is forecasting that by September the Fed will be in a position to raise the rate and will do so by that first quarter point.

TGR: A recent story in Al Jazeera suggests that China intends to move aggressively to make Shanghai the center of the gold world. What do you make of this?

AK: It's a significant development. China has spoken often of its desire to increase its reserve holdings of gold. We don't really know how much gold China holds, but we do know that China has become the world's largest gold producer. China is certainly seeking to increase its control over the pricing of gold. This is a reality that not many investors are paying attention to.

TGR: As ownership of physical gold continues to shift from West to East, would Shanghai's more powerful role lead to a higher gold price?

AK: A long-term trend has been established. Is it constructive for the price of gold? It has the potential to be, but ultimately, the price will serve as a barometer measuring the health of the larger economies in a global perspective.

In the meantime, this shift to Shanghai will increase the desire for investors to know more about the health of the Chinese economy and how that will impact the price of gold, just as today the price of gold is to a great extent determined by considerations of the health of the U.S. economy.

TGR: A June 15 BMO Research note states that you have "moved toward a more constructive view of the senior gold miners." Have the senior miners slimmed down and become more efficient?

AK: They were forced to do so by the decline in the price of gold. They have been forced to move their companies to the point where they can operate profitably at a lower gold price.

They have achieved this in a number of ways. First, they have reduced their corporate overhead on an absolute or per-ounce basis quite substantially. Second, they began readjusting their capital programs. They scaled back new project development and reduced sustaining capital budgets dramatically.

TGR: Have the senior miners increased efficiency at the cost of compromising their reserves?

AK: This is a matter that concerns investors. Reducing stripping in open-pit scenarios decreases sustaining costs but also results in fewer ounces mined. So, sustaining capital has declined because reserves have declined. It is our view, however, that producers have not cut as deeply as investors may think, that they have not rationalized sustaining capital levels to the point where they compromise mine lives.

TGR: You initiated coverage on six gold producers in June. Could you talk about the two that you have rated Outperform?

AK: They are Goldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE), to which we have given a 52-week target price of $22 and Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX:TSX; ABX:NYSE), for which our target price is $16.

I'll start with Goldcorp. Its shares began underperforming relative to its peers after weak Q1/15 results were announced. These surprised the market, which immediately began focusing on recent criticisms of the company: It missed guidance from 2014 and its balance sheet suffered through recent very large capital programs. This led to concerns about debt and worries that the company would neither meet its 2015 production guidance nor generate free cash flow. This is a market situation I like to call "maximum ugliness."

The reality is that most of the issues Goldcorp was dealing with have been or are being resolved. We expect the company will meet its guidance. We expect it will show free cash flow sufficient to support its dividend, repair its balance sheet and invest in future opportunities. Goldcorp shares are lagging now, but we expect that investors will soon become cognizant of the new realities, and shares will outperform throughout the remainder of 2015.

TGR: Goldcorp has over the last 12 months brought on-stream three new mines: Éléonore in Quebec, Cochenour in Ontario and Cerro Negro in Argentina. That has to be a positive for its shares, right?

AK: Absolutely. Two of those new mines were declared commercial in Q1/15, and as this new suite of mines ramps up production, there's a real opportunity for investors. These mines can be optimized at higher production rates. They'll have healthy reserve grades for the next couple of years and the capacity to grow over time. Goldcorp shares are suffering now because there were a few hiccups along the path to production, and this wore thin the patience of investors.

TGR: Goldcorp dropped out of a bidding war over Osisko Mining. Is it now looking for another major acquisition?

AK: This is a company built on acquisition. You could say that this is in Goldcorp's DNA. It does not invest much in greenfields exploration like some of its peers; it prefers to buy projects it can then develop. I think the Osisko bid hurt Goldcorp shares because investors believed it was too soon, that it should have resolved the problems I mentioned before it started buying. Once investors are persuaded, as we are, that the company has or soon will resolve these problems, they will be more than willing to support future Goldcorp acquisitions.

TGR: Tell me what you like about Barrick.

AK: This is a story about transformation. Barrick is the largest gold-producing company globally, but it was directionless until the beginning of this year, when it articulated its new plan. The company is now focused on quality, on its core assets and on reducing debt. In the execution of this plan, we are seeing a much healthier Barrick emerge. This is a company with the potential to look at good-quality growth opportunities and plan for the next generation.

Ours is not a universally accepted view. Some investors are quite critical of our thesis. But we maintain that a slimmer, smaller and much more profitable Barrick is one that can begin to rebuild in a manner very attractive to investors.

TGR: So you're impressed with Barrick's new management?

AK: We're impressed with the direction it has taken. It still has a lot of work to do, and we know of the opportunities that are present. We've seen a number of operations divested by Barrick, and management teams of those new companies have shown that they can turn around those assets.

To give one example, Acacia Mining Plc (ACA:LSE), formerly African Barrick and two-thirds owned by Barrick Gold, has demonstrated that there was a lot of excess cost within the Barrick structure. It has further demonstrated how to remove that excess cost and revealed the opportunity this represents.

TGR: When you spoke to The Gold Report last year, you noted, "Over the last couple of years, valuations of royalty companies have come down significantly relative to precious metal producers." Are royalty companies still undervalued?

AK: Since that interview, we have seen continued support for royalties and some of their valuations expand. But we still see some of the larger producers trading at comparable multiples. So I think there are opportunities within the royalties.

TGR: Which royalty companies do you follow?

AK: Only one: Silver Wheaton Corp. (SLW:TSX; SLW:NYSE). The company has a great business model. Royalties are always the safe-haven trade with the precious metal world; they do best when metals prices are under pressure. At times like these, it is to royalty companies that investors move money.

TGR: Are the days of pure silver producers and pure silver royalty companies at an end?

AK: We have observed that trend and expect it to continue. For many of the silver producers we cover, there is a move toward increasing gold exposure. Silver Wheaton has also moved in that direction by spending $800 million ($800M) to increase its stream of Vale S.A.'s (VALE:NYSE) Salobo gold mine in Brazil to 50%.

TGR: Among the silver producers you follow, which are your favorites?

AK: Tahoe Resources Inc. (TAHO:NYSE; THO:TSX) and Fresnillo Plc (FRES:LSE).

TGR: In June, Goldcorp sold 58M Tahoe shares for $1 billion. That was 26% of Tahoe. Why did this happen, and what effect will it have on Tahoe?

AK: The divestiture of its Tahoe shares was an easy way for Goldcorp to strengthen its balance sheet and not draw on credit lines to complete construction of Cerro Negro and Éléonore. This selloff has had no effect on Tahoe other than to depress its shares. We see this as a real opportunity for investors. Tahoe is a solid company with a fine silver mine in Guatemala, Escobal, and two fine assets in Peru, its La Arena gold mine and its Shahuindo near-term gold project. We see it generating consistent free cash flow that will support not only its dividend but also grow its balance sheet over time.

TGR: How well has Tahoe integrated its Peruvian acquisitions?

AK: We will find out soon with the release of its Q2/15 production and earnings results.

TGR: What do you like about Fresnillo?

AK: Fresnillo has good quality assets in Mexico. It is expanding its Fresnillo mine, has completed a major expansion at its Saucito operations and is building a new mine called San Julián. Fresnillo is investing in its future and growing its business. Like Goldcorp, its balance sheet is being drawn down, a process we see being accomplished by Q1/16.

TGR: A while back, there was a lot of bearish talk about the new Mexican royalty-taxation regime. Was this overstated?

AK: No. It did impact the mining companies, and investors imputed this impact into their share prices.

TGR: Has it resulted in a decrease in mining investment?

AK: No, I don't believe so.

TGR: Which junior and emerging silver producers do you want to talk about?

AK: I'll mention two. The first is MAG Silver Corp. (MAG:TSX; MVG:NYSE). Its principal asset is the Juanicipio project, a 44%/56% joint venture with Fresnillo in the Fresnillo District. It's high quality but early stage, with production forecast for 2018. In April, Fresnillo reported assays that included 405 grams per ton (405 g/t) silver, 2.7 g/t gold, 3.2% lead, 4.1% zinc and 0.37% copper over 35.4 meters. The market was quite excited about these results and for good reason.

TGR: And the other emerging silver producer is?

AK: Bear Creek Mining Corp. (BCM:TSX.V), which operates in Peru. Besides MAG silver, it has the best-quality assets of any silver junior. It has a very large silver reserve—over 500 million ounces (500 Moz)—relative to its market cap of $86M.

It has two projects. Santa Ana was frozen by the Peruvian government. This is now the subject of an international arbitration, one that I believe Bear Creek has a very good chance of winning. Its second project is Corani. This has Proven and Probable reserves of 228 Moz silver, 2.77 billion pounds (2.77 Blb) lead and 1.47 Blb zinc, at a grade of 51.6 g/t silver. According to its June feasibility study, it has a 20.9% after-tax internal rate of return and a $660M net present value. Mine life is forecast to be 18 years, and the sustaining capital expenditure is $667M. In this market, finding financing will be a challenge. I think Corani will need to wait for a more positive view of the future price of silver.

TGR: To what extent are companies operating in Peru deprecated because of the news of anti-mining riots coming out of that country?

AK: Bear Creek's share price was a casualty of Peruvian politics. And the stories about anti-mining protests do affect the share prices of other companies there. However, Peru's future prospects are very dependent on a healthy mining economy. Its current government is actually very supportive of mining, seeing it as a means to improve quality of life within rural Peru.

TGR: Are there any companies you could mention that are being ignored by the market now?

AK: We talk to investors about where to find value within the gold space without having to worry about the current gold price. One of those opportunities is in what we call predevelopment names. Some are Torex Gold Resources Inc. (TXG:TSX),which is building the 4.8 Moz El Limon-Guajes mine in Mexico, True Gold Mining Inc. (TGM:TSX.V), which is building the 5 Moz Karma mine in Burkina Faso and Asanko Gold Inc. (AKG:NYSE.MKT; AKG:TSX), which is building the 2.3 Moz Asanko mine in Ghana. All these companies have the balance sheets and the financing necessary to go into production, so long as they execute according to plan. And they're trading at fairly significant discounts relative to intermediate or junior gold producers.

Another company in this group is Guyana Goldfields Inc. (GUY:TSX), which will declare commercial production at its 8.4 Moz Aurora mine this year. Its share price has done very well relative to its peers throughout its execution.

TGR: So you believe that West Africa remains a good mining region?

AK: A number of companies operating in Burkina Faso have suffered depressed share prices. Many investors remain concerned about the transition to a new government and the new mining regime. Even though we're probably looking at increased taxation there, it's a pretty supportive jurisdiction and has gone through a fairly orderly regime change. I expect that investors will over time become more comfortable with West Africa.

TGR: Summer is traditionally the weakest season for precious metals equities. Is it prudent for investors to buck the prevailing wisdom and take positions in gold and silver companies now?

AK: The history of the last 20 years has demonstrated the wisdom of summer buying. The seasonality analysis BMO did last year concluded that investors who bought in June and sold in September realized average returns of 9–10% 8 times out of 10. This is a real opportunity, and investors should pay attention.

Andrew Kaip is managing director of mining equity research at BMO Capital Markets. Previously, he worked as a mining analyst at Haywood Securities, most recently covering gold and silver junior exploration and mining companies. Prior to that, he served as a project and consulting geologist for more than 10 years. Kaip received his Bachelor of Science in geology from Carleton University and his Master of Science in economic geology from the University of British Columbia and is a professional geologist.

 Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Interviews page.

Source: Kevin Michael Grace of The Gold Report 

http://ift.tt/1Sls4LW

DISCLOSURE:
1) Kevin Michael Grace conducted this interview for Streetwise Reports LLC, publisher of The Gold Report, The Energy Report and The Life Sciences Report, and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee. He owns, or his family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.
2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Silver Wheaton Corp., Tahoe Resources Inc., MAG Silver Corp., Bear Creek Mining Corp., Asanko Gold Inc. and Guyana Goldfields Inc. Goldcorp Inc. is not affiliated with Streetwise Reports. The companies mentioned in this interview were not involved in any aspect of the interview preparation or post-interview editing so the expert could speak independently about the sector. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services.
3) Andrew Kaip: I own, or my family owns, shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am, or my family is, paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: Disclosures available here. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I determined and had final say over which companies would be included in the interview based on my research, understanding of the sector and interview theme. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.
4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts' statements without their consent.
5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports' terms of use and full legal disclaimer.
6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview until after it publishes.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2014 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

 

The post BMO's Andrew Kaip: The gold majors are back appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1Sls6n4

Barrick sells 50% of Zaldivar for $1 billion cash

Top gold miner Barrick Gold on Thursday announced the sale of a 50% stake in its Zaldivar copper mine in Northern Chile to London-listed Antofagasta Plc for a shade over $1 billion in cash.

A number of well-known mining companies including BHP Billiton (ASX:BHP) which operates the nearby Escondida mine, Canada’s Teck Resources (TSX:TCK, NYSE: TCK), Hudbay Minerals (TSX:HBM) and China Molybdenum Co were said to have been in the running and the family-controlled copper miner's bid came as something of surprise.

Antofagasta, which last year produced 705,000 tonnes of copper and 270,000 ounces of gold, and Barrick will operate Zaldivar as a joint venture. The deal is expected to close before the end of the year.

Barrick has off-loaded assets worth $800 million this year including Cowal mine for $550 million in cash and $298 million for its Porgera mine, as it comes to terms with a $13 billion debt load.

Zaldivar, an open-pit, heap-leach mine, produced 222 million pounds of copper in 2014, according to Barrick’s website.

Proven and probable copper reserves from the mine as at Dec. 31, 2014, were 5.56 billion pounds. Production costs last year were US$1.65 a pound and they are increasing as head grades fall.

Barrick Gold Corp (NYSE:ABX, TSE:ABX) was trading up slightly in after hours trade in New York on the news following a 2.7% decline during regular trading.

Barrick's market value has decline 45% just over the last three months and is now worth $8.4 billion in New York.

That compares to a $64 billion capitalization when gold was at $1,900 in 2011. Barrick's gold production is expected to fall to between 6.2m – 6.5m ounces as it disposes of underperforming assets.

The post Barrick sells 50% of Zaldivar for $1 billion cash appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1KCfKCE

Platinum price: New round of industrial action

Platinum price: New round of industrial action

Source: YouTube

On Thursday, platinum futures in New York enjoyed a fifth session of gains as investors spooked by a fall to a near seven-year low last week eye developments in top producer South Africa and vehicle markets around the world.

In afternoon trade on the Nymex in New York platinum for delivery in October added $2.20 to $987.20 an ounce, up sharply from an intra-day plunge on July 20 to $946.30 an ounce but within shouting distance of levels last seen end 2008. Compared to this time last year the metal is down 32.7%.

Sister metal palladium also found its footing with Nymex September contracts exchanging hands for $619.10, up 0.5% or $3.50 after plunging below $600 an ounce last week for the firs time in three year. The price of palladium jumped to 13-year highs above $900 an ounce in September last year.

Platinum's primary use is in catalytic converters to reduce emissions – specifically for diesel vehicles – and Europe's automakers are the top consumers of the metal where diesel makes up 50% of the market. Palladium finds more application in gasoline engines and is therefore more exposed to the Chinese and US markets.

China, is the world's largest and fastest growing vehicle market, but the slowing economy and the chaos on equity market dented consumer confidence inside the country.

Predictions of some 6% year on year growth through 2020 were put in doubt after passenger car sales contracted 3.4% in June and production volumes also declined. In Europe the trend was the opposite with June sales rebounding by 15% from a weak May and in the US car sales remained on track for the best year in a decade.

Another factor putting the market under pressure is South African production of platinum returning to levels ahead of the crippling five-month strike in 2014.

But with labour action a constant threat and large parts of the industry operating at a loss, output from the country which produces more than 70% of the world's platinum (and together with Russia control nearly 80% of primary PGM production) is expected to be lower in coming months.

World number three platinum producer Lonmin last week announce it will close two shafts in the country and idle three others. That will result in roughly 100,000 ounces of lost annual production – 2% of global supply – and a 6,000 or 16% reduction in its workforce.

Anglo American, parent of Angloplat which on its own produces more than 30% of the world's platinum, last week announced it is cutting a third of its global workforce or 53,000 positions over the next few years.

Amplats has put a number of its South Africa mines up for sale, but so far has only attracted low-ball offers and the preferred route now appears to be a spin off by means of an IPO.

While smaller player Northam announced on Thursday a three-year deal with unions at its Zondereinde mine which produces 300,000 ounces a year similar-sized Aquarius Platinum said yesterday it is reviewing the viability of its shafts in South Africa and Zimbabwe which it shares with Angloplat and second largest producer Impala respectively.

The country's National Union of Mineworkers and the more radical Amcu labour organization have vowed to fight any jobs cuts in the sector. They are also getting support from South Africa's ruling African National Congress party which on Tuesday called any job cuts in the mining sector "unpatriotic" and that lay-offs should not be the first option "every time the behaviour of commodity prices goes down" reports the BBC.

Capital Economics estimate that on average the price of platinum has increased by 20% during each of the past eight disruptive episodes in South Africa. The independent research firm predicts the platinum price to rise to around $1,060 by the end of the year.

Platinum price: New round of industrial action

Source: Capital Economics

Meanwhile, this week workers at Stillwater Mining Co, the only platinum and palladium mine in the US also rejected managements latest offer. The Montana miner suffered work stoppages in 2004 and 2007 during labour disputes and in May said it's sticking to targets of 520,000 to 535,000 ounces of production this year.

The post Platinum price: New round of industrial action appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1VQaAGL

INFOGRAPHIC: The origin of the Greek crisis

Courtesy of: Visual Capitalist

In past charts and infographics, we’ve broken down parts of the Greek crisis with a focus on particular issues. For example, the exodus in population or a breakdown of Greece’s debt by creditor.

However, today’s infographic puts everything all in one place and recaps the full story from start to near-finish. There is a thorough timeline that shows the events that have led to today in chronological order. The infographic also charts various struggles, ranging from the country’s failure in collecting taxes to the exponential increase in net borrowing after the Lehman collapse.

Here’s a quick recap of the most salient facts in the infographic:

  • In 1994, the Greek 10-yr bond yield was just short of 25%. With plans to join the monetary union, the Greek yield got whittled down over the next five years to converge with the rest of the euro zone at closer to 6%.
  • From 1999 until the Lehman collapse in 2008, Greek bonds traded at par with all other euro zone countries. For almost a decade, investors pegged Greece as having the same amount of risk as Germany or France.
  • The European Debt Crisis begins and bond yields decouple. Greece’s yield skyrockets to closer to 30% in 2012 before the second bailout is approved by the euro zone.
  • Greece’s public sector debt is now at 172%, which is far higher than any other country in the euro zone. We’ve broken down this debt by creditor here.
  • Greek unemployment is higher than in the United States during the Great Depression. Compare Greece’s 25.6% unemployment rate to that of other semi-troubled countries such as Portugal (13.2%) or Italy (12.4%).
  • Greece’s spending increased dramatically over the years from €71 billion (2002) to €125 billion (2009). The only problem? Revenues peaked at only €95 billion in 2008.
  • The difference between spending and revenue is Greece’s net borrowing. The biggest deficit run was in 2009 when revenue was €89 billion and spending was €125 billion. That’s a difference of €36 billion when Greece’s GDP was only €237 billion at the time.
  • Greece’s government spending is not the highest in relation to its GDP. At 49.3%, it trails Italy (51.1%), France (57.2%), and Finland (58.7%).
  • However, Greece’s tax collection is the worst, which severely impairs revenue. In 2010, an astounding 89.5% of annual revenue collection was outstanding undisputed tax debt.
  • Greeks are fleeing the country. Since the crisis the population has been shrinking dramatically. As we noted in our Greek exodus chart, the population decreased by nearly 100,000 people in both 2013 and 2014. Bank deposit flows have also been negative for the most part since 2009 as well.

Original graphic by: SCMP

 

 

The post INFOGRAPHIC: The origin of the Greek crisis appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1grap4H

The euro isn't dead

While the world can count dozens of important currencies, when it comes to top line financial and investment discussions, the currency marketplace really comes down to a one-on-one cage match between the two top contenders: the U.S. Dollar and the Euro.

In recent years the contest has become a blowout, with the Dollar pummeling the Euro into apparent submission. Based on the turmoil created by the European Debt Crisis and the continuing problems in Greece and other overly indebted southern tier European economies, many investors may have come to assume that Euro boosters will be forced to ultimately throw in the towel and call off the entire experiment, thereby leaving the Dollar completely unchallenged as the champion currency, now and for the foreseeable future. This is a stunning turnaround for a currency that was seen just a few years ago as a credible threat to supplant the dollar as the world's reserve.

Putting aside the fact that there are many important currency relationships besides the euro/dollar axis, economists, journalists, and investors have forgotten the 16-year history of the Euro and how the currency has survived and prospered after many had assumed it might be consigned to the dustbin of history.

The Euro was created in 1992 by the Maastricht Treaty (which created the European Union) but did not come into being as an accounting unit (not a physical currency) until January of 1999. In the lead up to its launch, many had argued that the Euro would become the heir to the rock solid Deutsche Mark, the German currency that had risen to preeminence on the back of Germany's post war resurgence, high savings rate, enviable trade balance, and post-Soviet unification. With German bankers in a firm leadership position in the European Central Bank and the European Union, many had hoped that the new Euro would adopt the virtues of the Mark. As a result, the Euro debuted with a value of 1.18 dollars. But the honeymoon was short-lived.

Almost immediately from the point it began freely trading the Euro began to encounter severe headwinds. The Russian debt default and the Asian currency crisis in the late 1990's caused investors to sell assets in the emerging markets and seek safe havens in the dominant economies. This provided a crucial early test for the Euro. But the new currency failed to attract much of this fast flowing transnational investment flow. On the other hand, the U.S. markets and the U.S. Dollar were beckoning as extremely attractive targets.

In the second term of Bill Clinton's presidency, America, at least on paper, looked very strong. From 1998-2000, based on Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) figures, GDP growth averaged 4.4%, which is roughly four times the rate that we have seen since 2008. The expanding economy and the relative spending restraints that had been made by the Clinton Administration and the newly elected Republican Congress resulted in hundreds of billions of annual U.S. government surpluses, the first such black ink in generations. Many economists comically concluded that the surpluses would become permanent (in fact they lasted just a few years). At the same time, U.S. stock markets were notching some of the biggest gains in their history. From the beginning of 1997 to the end of 1999 the Dow Jones surged by approximately 69%. The tech heavy Nasdaq, the epicenter of the "dotcom" bubble, rallied by an eye popping 294%.

As a result, international money began pouring into the Dollar, taking the wind out of the sails of the newly launched Euro. The stretched valuations that had pushed up U.S. stocks to nosebleed levels failed to dissuade investors from piling in well into the mid-point of 2000. Not only had Wall Street spread the gospel of the new economy, where negative earnings and high debt no longer mattered, but many were convinced that the interventionist tendencies of the Alan Greenspan-led Federal Reserve would protect investors against losses.

As a result of these forces, the Euro first fell to below parity against the dollar on January 27, 2000 when it closed at 98.9 U.S. cents, a fall of 16% from its debut. After that psychological barrier was breached, the selling intensified. By May 8, 2000 the Euro traded at just 89.5 U.S. cents, an additional 9% decline in just three months. This prompted news stories like a BBC article entitled "Was the Euro a Mistake?" Top economists and investors began wondering if the new currency would last much longer.

The Euro's reputation was further tarnished in September of 2000 when Danish voters rejected their country's plans to adopt the Euro. The distaste shown by a small country widely considered squarely in the mainstream of Western European culture was a huge black eye for the Euro experiment. The pessimism sent the currency down another 6% in just one month following the Danish election, reaching what would become an all-time low of just 82.7 U.S. cents on October 25, 2000. At that level the Euro had fallen a full 30% from its debut valuation. It looked like game over. The Euro vs. Dollar was shaping up to be a Bambi vs. Godzilla scenario.

By the late 1990's gold had been in a bear market that had lasted almost 20 years. As a result, investor sentiment for the metal, which had historically been considered a safe haven asset, was at an all-time low. As a result, many Europeans moved into the dollar to seek shelter instead. At that time gold was trading below Euros 300 per ounce (FRED, FRB St. Louis). Those who had exchanged their Euros for Dollars (when the Euro was 83 cents) would have seen those holdings decline by 50% over the following eight years. On the other hand gold nearly doubled in Euro terms over the same time frame. As this article is being written, gold is now trading at 1,000 Euros per ounce (even after the recent big drop) while the Euro hovers around $1.10. So Europeans who bought and held Dollars continuouslywhen the Euro hit its low in 2000 would be down 25%, but those who bought and held gold instead would have seen those holdings triple. (Past performance does not guarantee future results).

The bursting of the dotcom bubble in mid-2000 finally caused a decisive break with the investment trends that had predominated in the previous number of years (see my recent article "The Big Picture"). Just as the dotcom wealth began disappearing, taking the U.S. federal budget surpluses with it, the emerging markets began to recover, and the much-maligned Euro started getting some attention.

By January 5, 2001 the Euro had hit 95.4 cents, a stunning 15.3% rally in just over two months. And although the Euro zigzagged substantially over the next year and a half (with an early retreat in 2002, causing the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to wonder whether the Euro was a "Doomed Currency"), by the second half of 2002 the uptrend was firmly in place, with the Euro reaching parity again with the Dollar by July 15, 2002, 30 months after it had fallen below that level. By April 22, 2008 the Euro traded at $1.60 to the Dollar, a price that represented a 36% increase over its debut level and a stunning 93% rally from its October 2000 low.

But when the Financial Crisis of 2008 reached full flower in August, September, and October of 2008, investors once again panicked as they had eight years before. In seeking a safe haven, they once again chose the U.S. Dollar (perhaps motivated by the low valuations then assigned to the greenback). As funds began flowing out of the Euro and into the Dollar, the Euro dropped rapidly. By the end of October the Euro only fetched $1.26, a 21% drop from its April high. But when the markets stabilized in 2009 so did the Euro. It essentially traded sideways against the Dollar over the next two years, reaching back to $1.46 by June 6, 2011.

The euro isn't dead....dollar-euro exchange rate graph

Compiled by Euro Pacific Capital using data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) from Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) of St. Louis

When the European debt crisis really started grabbing headlines in 2011, with yields on sovereign debt of the so-called PIIGS nations (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain) widening to record territory in comparison to the sovereign bonds of Germany, scrutiny of the Euro came into question once again. The uncertainty over possible bailouts for European banks that were holding potentially toxic government debt was too much uncertainty for the market to handle. The pressure on the Euro was intensified by the slowing Eurozone economy. These forces combined helped to push the Euro down steadily during 2012 and 2013.

But the straw that really broke the camel's back came at the end of 2014 when it became clear that the European Central Bank, under the new leadership of Mario Draghi, would finally succeed in short-circuiting the anti-bailout restrictions of the Maastricht Treaty and outflank the objections of the German financial and political establishment in order to bring full blown Quantitative Easing (QE) to the Eurozone. The QE program essentially involves creating Euros out of thin air in order to buy government debt and hold down long-term interest rates.

Expectations about European QE came at a time when most observers concluded that the U.S. economy was finally on track for a strong recovery in 2015 and that the Federal Reserve (which has already showered the United States with almost six full years of QE) had finally done away with the program and would begin raising rates for the first time in almost 10 years. Despite a languishing economy, the U.S. markets had once again delivered stellar returns, with the S&P 500 rising 64% between 2011 and 2014, doing so without ever experiencing a correction of more than 10%.

These movements provided a strong rationale for investors to sell Euros and buy Dollars. In the 12 months from May 2014 to May 2015 the Euro fell by about 20%. When it bottomed out at $1.05 on March 11, 2015, the Euro had fallen 34% from its peak seven years earlier. This revived the opinions that the Euro was dead and that the Dollar would be the only real reserve currency for the foreseeable future.

But what if the assumptions about a U.S. economic recovery and Fed rate hikes were wrong? Could observers be mistaken now about the trajectory of the Dollar vs. the Euro as they were back in 2000? While some had warned that the dotcom bubble of 2000 could end badly, very few understood how deeply the mania was the root of the economic expansion and how severely the final flameout would threaten the entire economy. Similarly, very few had foreseen the dangers that the housing and mortgage bubble had presented to the wider economy in 2008. The economic and market contractions in 2000 and 2008 might have been much worse if the Fed had not been able to cut interest rates by almost 500 basis points in the face of the crises. (No such options are available if the economy contracts today). In other words, complacency can be very dangerous, especially if there is no ammunition to combat a crisis if it arrives unexpectedly.

Confidence is the only thing that really undergirds modern fiat currencies. But confidence can be very ephemeral…disappearing as quickly as it arrives. The U.S. Dollar benefits from confidence that the Euro currency may just be unworkable, that the U.S. economy will continue to improve, and that the Fed will raise rates throughout the remainder of 2015 and into 2016. If these expectations are unfulfilled, there could be a Euro reversal.

When a trend remains in place for a while, people tend to think it will continue forever. When it reverses, the shock can be widespread. Just as currency speculators over-estimated the strength of the U.S. economy in 2000, I believe they are making the same mistake again today. But the U.S. economy is actually much weaker and more vulnerable now than it was in 2000. If the spell of confidence surrounding the Dollar is broken, it may also reverse the fortunes of other beaten down currencies. This could present a sea change in the global investment landscape for which wise investors should be prepared.

Read the original article at Euro Pacific Capital

 

Best Selling author Peter Schiff is the CEO and Chief Global Strategist of Euro Pacific Capital. His podcasts are available on The Peter Schiff Channel on Youtube
Catch Peter's latest thoughts on the U.S. and International markets in the Euro Pacific Capital Summer 2015 Global Investor Newsletter!

The post The euro isn't dead appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1U9YIxu

Le pétrole finit en légère baisse à New York après une séance incertaine

prix du petrole New YorkNew York: Les cours du pétrole ont terminé en petite baisse jeudi à New York, à l'issue d'une séance pendant laquelle ils ont oscillé autour de l'équilibre, sans beaucoup d'actualité spécifique.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1IuEtGP

Philae révèle la matière organique de la comète Tchouri

Des molécules organiques inédites sur une comète, une structure variée en surface mais plutôt homogène en profondeur, des composés organiques formant des grains : les résultats issus des premières données de Philae à la surface de la comète Tchouri dessinent un visage surprenant. Cette...

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1eDzBDb

Nemaska Lithium gets go ahead for its Whabouchi mine in Quebec

Nemaska Lithium gets go ahead for its Whabouchi mine in QuebecCanadian junior Nemaska Lithium (TSX-V:NMX) has overcome the last hurdle to go ahead with its Quebec Whabouchi project, after receiving a positive federal environmental assessment decision from the Minister of Environment of Canada.

The resolution allows the company to pursue project financing discussions to start building the mine, located in the James Bay region, one of the two lithium districts in Quebec, the firm said in a statement.

Nemaska intends to construct, operate and decommission an open-pit surface and underground spodumene mine for the purpose of producing lithium, highly used in the manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries for cell phones and electric cars.

The project includes a waste and tailings impoundment area, an ore concentrator, administrative and maintenance buildings.

The Whabouchi mine would have a production capacity of approximately 3,000 tonnes per day over an estimated mine life of 26 years.

The company highlighted that the Cree and Jamesians communities of northwestern Quebec have supported the project since first proposed.

As the project proceeds to the next phase, it will continue to be subject to Canada's strong environmental laws, rigorous enforcement and follow-up, and fines for non-compliance, said the Minister of Environment.

Growing market

So far the two major lithium producers are Australia and Chile, with the former ranked just ahead of the copper producing country as the world’s number one source of the resource in 2014.

Last year, Australia produced 13,000 tonnes of lithium, with Chile producing 12,900t. Most of Australia’s supply comes from Western Australia, including from the world’s largest known lithium reserve, the Greenbushes project, which has been operational for more than 25 years.

The largest identified resources are in Chile and Bolivia, which between them hold over 40% of the planet’s known totals. Bolivia, however, has not opened up to any foreign mining companies, insisting instead that any lithium extracted there be processed within the country.

The post Nemaska Lithium gets go ahead for its Whabouchi mine in Quebec appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1DcyBlz

Slow growth spoiling China’s appetite for coal

LONDON – The World Coal Association (WCA) has today called on the World Bank to recognise the vital role of coal in bringing affordable, reliable electricity to hundreds of millions of people in developing and emerging economies.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global electricity from coal is expected to grow by around 33% to 2040. Demand for coal in Southeast Asia alone is expected to increase 4.8% a year through to 2035.

“The reason for this growth is that there are very real energy needs to be met,” said Benjamin Sporton, WCA Chief Executive. “1.3 billion people live in energy poverty. 2.7 billion people do not have clean cooking facilities and rely on dung and wood. Coal plays a critical role in bringing affordable, reliable electricity to hundreds of millions of people in developing and emerging economies, particularly across Asia.

“China is the most obvious example of a country that has developed rapidly using coal. Over the past three decades the country has connected 99% of its population to the grid and seen its economy grow at an astonishing rate. None of this development would have been possible without the use of coal. In fact, if you take China out of the equation, global poverty has barely improved over the past three decades.”

“Rather than wishing away fossil fuels, the World Bank should be committing to supporting the wider deployment of 21st Century coal technology – high efficiency, low emissions power generation and carbon capture, use and storage,” Mr Sporton said.

“High-efficiency, low-emissions (HELE) technologies and carbon capture, use, and storage (CCUS) have the potential to dramatically reduce emissions from coal-fired power generation, while still meeting the demand for coal. Raising the average efficiency of the global coal fleet from the current 33% to 40% would save 2 gigatonnes of CO2 emissions – equivalent to India’s annual CO2 emissions or running the Kyoto Protocol three times over.”

Modern technologies are also available that reduce other emissions from coal plants. “In the United States, emissions of NOx, SOx and PM were reduced by between 82% and 96% since 1970, while coal consumption increased by 146%. This clearly demonstrates the huge potential of off-the-shelf technologies in reducing emissions from coal use,” said Mr Sporton.

“All sources of energy have a role to play in meeting demand – both in developed and developing countries. While renewables have an important role to play in providing off-grid electricity to domestic users, it is impossible for an economy to develop without access to affordable, reliable, grid-based electricity.

“It is only by treating climate and development objectives as integrated priorities that we will successfully overcome these global challenges,” said Mr Sporton.

The post appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1h85YM5

Le pétrole se stabilise, aidé par les stocks américains

prix du petrole LondresLondres: Les cours du pétrole restaient quasi stables en fin d'échanges européens, soutenus par le déclin inattendu des réserves de brut et de la production aux États-Unis mais toujours lesté par une offre excédentaire.


from L'actualité du prix du baril de pétrole http://ift.tt/1JU5iku

Privacy implications of the extractive sector transparency measures act

The Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act (ESTMA) came into force on June 1, 2015. Throughout consultations on the Bill, key stakeholders raised questions regarding privacy implications, still  unanswered. In particular, in establishing new mandatory reporting on payments in the commercial development of oil, gas and minerals industry (the extractive sector), how specific will the information need to be and could it be linked to identifiable individuals?  By requiring that reports be made publicly available, is there a risk of disclosure of personal financial information?  By requiring to keep records for a still non-prescribed period of time, but of seven years in absence of prescription, is there an increased risk to the protection of personal financial information?

Analysing the privacy impact of legislation, and the legitimacy of that impact, requires first to focus on the objective and scope of that legislation. Legitimacy rests upon the proper integration of the individual right to privacy and the collective right to law and order. In this case, the objective of the Act is stated in its full title: “to implement Canada’s international commitments to participate in the fight against corruption through the imposition of measures applicable to the extractive sector”. The scope of the Act extends to extractive sector companies as “entities” making payments to “payees”, defined as governments and bodies established to perform duties and functions of governments. A payment made to an employee or a public office holder of a payee is deemed to have been made to the payee. On this basis, privacy risks appear totally manageable:

  • Entities are companies and payees are governments – neither are individuals and therefore do not trigger the application of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act which defines personal information as information “about an identifiable individual”. It follows that entities’ reports would meet the objectives of the Act without disclosing personal information.
  • Employees and public office holders of governments are subject to accountability obligations that reduce their reasonable expectations of privacy in the exercise of their functions. An established framework, organized around sections 19 of the Access to Information Act and section 8 of the Privacy Act, already governs the interface between protected personal information and publicly accessible information.

Still, privacy risks exist and should be mitigated by corporate policies and coming government regulations.

Corporate policies should,

  • Establish that there be no collection or retention of personal information beyond what is demonstrably necessary to meet the objective of the Act, and provide for supervision to ensure compliance  in that regard;
  • Provide that reports under the Act shall not contain personal information unless demonstrably necessary to meet the objective of the Act.

Government regulations will need to,

  • Establish reporting requirements that do not call for information specific to individuals except in accordance with current privacy law, namely where the information is already publicly accessible or where it is necessary to disclose it in the public interest.
  • Allow redaction of personal information before making a report publicly available, where a reporting entity would have deemed it necessary to include it in the report to the Minister but where it is not in the public interest to make it publicly available.
  • Establish the lowest retention period possible for record keeping under the Act.

In one sentence, while the Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act may, in theory, have privacy implications, in practice, they are easily manageable, and should be managed.

Chantal Bernier is Counsel in the Global Privacy and Cybersecurity Group at Dentons Canada LLP and former Interim Privacy Commissioner of Canada. 

 

 

 

 

 

The post Privacy implications of the extractive sector transparency measures act appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1h80C3D

L'imprévisible ouragan Nadine a enfin livré son secret

L'ouragan Nadine, qui s'était dirigé vers l’Europe en septembre 2012 avant de repartir brusquement vers l’Atlantique, avait alors surpris tout le monde. Les prévisionnistes l'avait même qualifié d’imprévisible. Une équipe de chercheurs vient enfin d'expliquer les raisons de cette étonnante...

from Les dernières actualités de Futura-Sciences http://ift.tt/1Jy6kGQ

Goldcorp axes dividend 60% amid dire gold market

Goldcorp axes dividend 60% amid dire gold market

Miners inside the Eureka vein at Cerro Negro gold and silver mine in Argentina's Santa Cruz province. (Image courtesy of Goldcorp via Flickr)

Goldcorp (TSX:G) (NYSE:GG), the world’s largest publicly traded gold miner by market value, has slashed its dividend by 60% to keep balance sheets healthy as bullion prices have dropped to five year-lows this month.

The mining giant, however, managed to double its profit for the second quarter, thanks mostly to the sale of its Tahoe Resources (TSX:THO) (NYSE:TAHO) share last month. The Vancouver-based firm earned US$392 million, or 47 cents per share in the three months ended in June, compared to a profit of $181 million, or 22 cents per share, in the same period last year.

This is the first time since the third-quarter of 2012 that Goldcorp is able to become cash-flow positive.

Excluding the Tahoe windfall, Goldcorp earned $65 million, or 8 cents per share. That was one cent higher than market expectations, but lower than last year due to lower bullion prices and costs linked to construction of a new mine in Quebec and another one in Argentina.

Like most of its peers, Goldcorp continues to work on lowering costs and shoring up its balance sheet. Those measures and the dividend cut are to “ensure the company has the financial flexibility to succeed in a volatile gold market,” Goldcorp Chief Executive Officer Chuck Jeannes said in the statement.

The firm said it expects to spend between $850 and $900 to produce an ounce of gold this year, less than its previous forecast of between $875 and $950.

Gold production increased 40% year-over-year to 908,000 ounces, as the new Cerro Negro mine in Argentina ramped up production, the Eleonore mine in Northern Quebec achieved commercial production, and the Peñasquito mine in Mexico performed well.

The post Goldcorp axes dividend 60% amid dire gold market appeared first on MINING.com.



from MINING.com http://ift.tt/1KBcSWP